Trinitarian Bible Society

This was my first sermon of today. I always start my day off with my morning prayers and meditations; and afterwards I then come straight to SermonAudio to jumpstart my day by listening to sermons; two or three at the very least. Today I chose to begin my day with this beautiful sermon. I always check to see if the KJV is the Bible that is used in the sermon. If the KJV is not used then I won’t listen. I refuse to listen to any sermon that is not from the KJV! AND the preacher must be preaching it with authority—and NOT worldly opinions of man—but the TRUTH of God’s Word! This particular preacher’s name will be added to my list of my top trusted pastor/preacher/teachers. I very thoroughly appreciate this man of God and how he sticks to God’s truths and Doctrines and it the opinions of false pulpit wolves. Thank you Brother Dr. Brother Allen. Thank you for honoring God’s Word. Blessings to you. Amen

Thank you for the wonderful work that you are doing!

I really appreciate your Sermons. Thank you for uploading them. God bless you.

A very deep blessing. Thank you.

A great blessing indeed in hearing Jabez Rutt, for the first time, recommended to us by Pastor Chalan Hetherington. Have placed it in Facebook for more to hear.Love in Christ, English Rose

Though William Tyndale was a man of renown, he used his renown for the purpose of advancing the wisdom of the Protestant Reformation by translating the Bible into the English language. Of course, William Tyndale is not the only notable Protestant Reformer of England. So was John Wycliffe of the 14th century.

Prior to the Scottish-born monarch James I (James VI) authorizing the translation of the Bible, William Tyndale, a Protestant Reformer, worked on Bible translations in English.When Tyndale was burned at the stake, he said, "Lord, open the King of England's eyes!" These words spoken by William Tyndale prepared Great Britain to adopt the Protestant Reformation.

In this sermon Pastor Silversides makes an invincible defense of the King James/Authorized Version, clearly showing the superior accuracy and reliability of the KJV over all modern "translations." Furthermore, he demonstrates that the necessity of reliance upon the Received Text of scripture and not upon newly discovered manuscripts is a doctrinal matter which all Christians can understand, regardless of whether or not they have knowledge of the original languages. Finally, Pastor Silversides discusses how the modern versions have only increased the confusion and disunity of today's church. If we may make our own observation, it seems evident to us that we Christians are facing grave dangers as Muslims and Roman Catholics flood into our countries, and that we must be praying and working for unity based on the truth of God's word if we are to stand against the perils we are sure to soon encounter. How can we do this if we can't even agree on what the word of God is? May God lead all of those who have departed from his truth in search of novelties to repentance!

As always excellent a man who believes every word of God

I am grateful to B. McCausland for pointing us to this sermon. I have to admit that to an American ear, hearing this is not the easiest thing. But, one soon grows accustomed to the rather high pitched voice of the speaker.The content and presentation covers a great deal of ground, hence the length of the sermon. Nevertheless I would encourage everyone who wishes to examine the Bible versions issue to listen to this, because it is quite thorough and the case is built up line upon line to leave no one in any doubt that the modern critical texts are grossly erroneous and that the Byzantine texts, and in particular the Received Texts were the traditional texts of the Churches from the earliest times to the late nineteenth century when they were set aside in favor of the corruptions upon which most modern versions are based.

Significant information. Very much appreciated

This sermon was very informative and made a great deal of sense in its application for the contemporary church. I heartily recommend it and also recommend that notes and bible references be made because there's a lot here to be remembered.

Really, modern translations manifest 'political correctness' tendencies of the day. As an observation, this can be asserted by the rendering of husband and wife instead of man and woman in I Corinthians 11:2-16 by which the teaching can be reduced to matrimonial context instead of universal context; or the variety of animal names rendered in the ESV for each time dragon appears in the AV.

This is the best and most articulate defense of KJV I've ever heard. Whatever the merits of the "critical" texts, the fact that it hasn't been used throughout most of the history of the Church creates a strong presumption against it. Rev. Silversides' makes a watertight reductio ad absurdum argument for the Received Text. If the latter is inferior to the critical text, it means that Christians have been relying on a lousy text for hundreds of years. If I really believed that, I'd look for some other religion.