Q70-74 - Are Paedobaptism proof-text valid? Household/Oiko-Baptisms in Acts & 1 Cor

Slideshow: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/e/2PACX-1vQHzJsZcIekNoIGx6YSEUfVSowba3RfcVyt-x1DhA9BkOvu40-JMRg7ZmTL6JU0eXzQWEy4fa87Z6df/pub?start=false&loop=false&delayms=5000

Are the proof-text that Paedobaptist use as further supports for Infant Baptism valid?

Today we continue answering this question by examining the household baptism (or oikobaptisms) in Acts and 1 Corinthians in the following passages:

1. The household of Cornelius (Acts 10:44-48; 11:13-18)
2. The household of Lydia (Acts 16:13-15)
3. The household of the Philippian jailor (Acts 16:30-34)
4. The household of Crispus (Acts 18:8; 1 Cor. 1:14)
5. The household of Stephanus (1 Cor. 1:16)
6. The household of Gaius (1 Cor. 1:14 – by implication)