Penal Substitutionary Atonement - Response to Grant Guikema

Response to this comment from Grant Guikema:

@grantguikema9821
5 days ago
PSA is so twisted. Ransoms are paid to kidnappers, to villains. So if you're saying he paid divine justice, then you are saying that God is the villain. Sin is not Gods problem, it's mine. The ransom was paid to death and the devil, but that's not the end of the story. Christ rose from the dead, defeating death and his enemies. Sacrifice is not a payment but a gift of hospitality and reconciliation. Nowhere in the OT is killing and death part of the sacrifice. Blood is used for cleansing. Food is offered as a gift. The killing is done outside the temple and never part of the sacrifice. Also He marked His passion and resurrection with Passover. Not yom kippor. Also the scapegoat is not killed So what about God's wrath? Well Justice is simply making things right. The idea is putting things in proper order. To the wicked, that is painful. To those that reject God their damnation is their own. Hope that helps. PSA necessitates either Arianism or Nestorianism because for the Father to Punish the Son demands you split the Trinity or split Christ. Both are terrible Heresy.