The Gospel, and Why Replacement Theology/Reconstructionism Fail

‎‎In this passage we see that Jesus the Messiah has come to this world specifically do be the deliverer of all who will Repent and Believe the gospel. ‎‎‎Here in this passage we see that Jesus has proclaimed that He must go to other towns to proclaim the Good news of the Kingdom of God, AKA the"Kingdom of Heaven". ‎That Good News as we know is the gospel. ‎That God has predestined to save an ELECT people for Himself, and now we must ask the next question. "What is the Kingdom of God." ‎Is It something that we see or build, or is this something that God does alone. ‎There are many different views of What the kingdom is and when it comes. ‎But regardless of what view you hold to, if that view is not directly aligned with scripture and grounded upon solid Biblical history.
‎If that view is not Christocentric, and Israel-ocentric, then it is wrong.
‎In VS 43. Jesus said that He must preach the good news of the Kingdom of God, He is making an escatalogical statement. No matter how you view the Kingdom of God, you cannot come to the conclusion that Jesus brought the Full kingdom of God upon earth 2000 years ago. We all agree that there is something more to come. We are talking about the coming Kingdom of Christ, known as the Millennial Kingdom Which is laid out in the 12th chapter of Rev.Reference to the bodily reign and rule of Jesus on Earth. ‎It is amazing that this idea is so pervasive in the one place that it should not be. I could understand if this were an Arminian theology, where God is left to reacting to our moves. ‎But this Idea of Replacement came from our own Reformed camp. ‎Brothers and sister that would fight for Election, deny it for the Jewish people??